I know, if I'm using 1 ColEQ per Sound my first wish a) is cleared.Ĭ) it will be very, very, very usefull if I can sort EQSlot (later) by (used) Frequence or maybe can copy one EQ-Slot to another. Ok, I think it's too much, but really, while testing I got to this points and missed them. Actually it seems, that sat of 3 will be routed to master out.ī) Hahaha and really cool will be, if there will be a radical high / low pass only for created Saturation-Snd. But maybe it will be really great, if there will be a "link" button between EQ-Parts, so, that maybe saturation of 3 & 4 will go to output of 4. EQ for synth 2 and then I need 3 & 4 EQ for next synth. This question is only 'luxus!' and I don't think you can realize, but I wanna ask.īecause ColEQ working from left to right (what really nice (Y) )Ī) I used first EQ (allways sep. I may not use this as much as other fx like scream or echo but it is far more valuable imo.
The prices on those kind of plugins are much more than this for sometimes less functionality.Īt the end of the day you get what you pay for and with this you’re getting much more. While you can use it for sound design and it’s great for that, I personally put it in the high end mixing/problem solving/polishing category. Yes it is pricey but I’d put this on par with any of the waves/slate/etc plug-ins for this kind of thing. Wish I could afford to make such cool videos for my products, maybe that would help sell them?
#Fabfilter pro q2 size in gb software
There are other REs that do far less costing as much (or more) as mine - I tried to price it according to the market and what I need to stay alive as a software company. With the Odd/Even harmonics and spectral coloring of the EQ interface, you can get many useful saturation types.
Update: If ColoringEQ was 30€ I would buy it, but I think 99€ is too much for something that has a sluggish GUI and can't be resold.ĬoloringEQ can definitely do Mid/Side, can boost and cut (Spectra says it’s only a boosting EQ?).
Sent from some crappy device using Tapatalk I’d love to see it too - I could never get it to work beyond one band in Reason, and the CPU hit was silly even at that point once you started using a few of these guys... If you wanted more than one band of EQ, things would get totally out of control.īut if you knew what you were doing, and had a killer CPU, it could certainly be done. It took a few Selig Gains in the mix, so it’s not free, and it eats CPU for breakfast. You can indeed - I testing the original concept years ago in Reason with a Combinator that gave me a single band of high or low EQ (two versions). I'm thinking that you can do a lot of what you can do with ColoringEQ with the basic Reason devices if you just take the time to set it up. Still, $99 is too much for such a device. Spectre looks cool, but Selig's ColoringEQ has different features (Note Control via CV or MIDI, modular-like back panel, 10 EQ types and 5 filter types, etc). what changed + sat in that range" (but I think this will be too much and you'll find many reasons why this is'nt really usefull ). what changed" (in some situations helpfull too) a third mode can be: "all in that range incl. "Only what changed" and second = "all in that range incl. we can buy for reason actually ) BUT ( )Ī) we can change (if we need - and sorry, please don't let me explain, but really there are some situations it will be helpfull here) ourselve between A3 and A4 = 440 Hz andī) between 2 kind of Solomode. For shure I'll buy this (because really is the best EQ + ++. In other DAWs this can be C4, but as this is a Reason Only device, it made sense to stick to that standard. > b) In Reason, A=440 Hz is A3, as C3 is middle C. Sweep the band to find the “muck” you want to cut out, then when you un-solo the band you will now be cutting what you were just listening to! The benefit to this approach is you can cut an EQ band, then solo it and only hear what you will be that band will be cutting. > a) When you solo an EQ band, you will only hear what the EQ is adding or taking away from the sound - that’s why if you solo a band that has no boost or cut, you will hear silence. I knowing you are the specialsist, so maybe I'm going wrong here, but. I think the after EQ, but it seems, that I don't hear this while soloing. What I've to hear? Audio before or the after EQ (of this EQ-part)?. Maybe I'm stupid, but if I'm using only maybe EQ 1 and 4, and I'm Solo 4. And So I now knowing how solo is working.